Classification of Hydrometeors from Microwave Satellite Data Using an Artificial Neural Networks Method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

Hydrometeors in the atmosphere, on any form (solid, liquid and gases), interact with microwave radiation (through scattering, absorption and emission). The Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B) measurements onboard NOAA satellites are sensitive to the types, shapes, and size distributions as well as fall behaviors of the hydrometeors in the AMSU-B resolution Volume and thus are useful to study different types of atmospheric hydrometeors. These microphysical signatures and classification of atmospheric hydrometeors can be utilized to initialize the cloud/mesoscale numerical weather prediction models, study of precipitation formation and life cycle, and choice of the right algorithm for precipitation estimation.  Therefore, In this paper, the signatures of eight types of hydrometeors,  including Thunderstorms (TS), Heavy rain (HR),  Light rain (LR), Moderate Rainfall (MR), Snowfall (SF), Snow cover (SC), Cloudy condition (CC), and  Clear sky (CS), using AMSU-B data by an artificial neural network method, simultaneously,  have been classified to eight different classes. During the study period (2000 to 2010), from about 200 of satellite passes, for each type of hydrometeor 200 data-sample and  overall 1600 data-sample, which was closest to Iran Meteorology Organization (IMO) reports have been collected. Our results show that different classes of rain, including light, moderate and heavy rainfall, with respect to other classes, with accuracies between 54 to 62% have poor classification capability, and other hydrometeors with an accuracy of about 80% correctly classified.  By considering three classes of rain as a single class (rain fall = RF), the accuracy of neural network classifier increased to 85%; among 400 pattern, about 340 pattern have correctly been classified

Keywords

References

 
1- Gourley, Jonathan J., Tabary, Pierre., and Chatelet, Jacques parent du., 2006, a fuzzy logic algorithm for the separation of precipitating from nonprecipitating echoes using polarimetric radar observations journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, vol. 24, pp. 1439-1451.
2- Marchand, Roger., Mace, Gerald g., Ackerman, Thomas., and Stephens, Graeme., 2008, hydrometeor detection using cloudsat an earth-orbiting 94-ghz cloud radar, journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology, vol. 25, pp. 519-533.
3- Mace, Gerald G., Zhang, Qiuqing., Vaughan, Mark., Marchand, Roger., Graeme Stephens, Trepte, Chip., and Winker, Dave., 2009, a description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged cloudsat and calipso data, journal of geophysical research, vol. 114, d00a26, doi:10.1029/2007jd009755, 2009
4- Introduction to data mining and knowledge discovery, third edition, two Crowds Corporation, http://www.twocrows.com/intro-dm.pdf, accessed on 12 april 2009.
5- Gupta, Shanti s., and Berger, James o., 1982, statistical decision theory vol. 2, pp.38.
6- Bringi, V. N., Rico-Ramirez, M. A., Thurai, M., 2011, Rainfall Estimation with Operational Polarimetric C-Band Radar in the United Kingdom: Comparison with a Gauge Network and Error Analysis. Journal of Hydrometeorology 12:5, 935-954
7- Hongping and Chandrasekar, V., 1999, Classification of Hydrometeors Based on Polarimetric Radar Measurements: Development of Fuzzy Logic and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems, and In Situ Verification, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 17, pp. 140-164.
8- Gheiby, A., Sen, P. N., Puranik, D. M., and Karekar, R. N., 2003, Thunderstorm identification from AMSU‐B data using an artificial neural network, Meteorological Applications, Vol.10, No. 4, pp. 329-336.
9- Gheiby, A., Sen, P. N., Puranik, D. M.,  and Karekar, R. N.,  2002: Recognition and Classification of Weather features from AMSU-B Remotely Sensed Information Using an Artificial neural network, IAPRS and SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, pp. 104-107,
10- Gheiby, A., and Mirzadeh, M., Multi-Spectral Classification of Hydrometeors Using AMSU-B Data, presented in 21st Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/17th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, American Meteorology Society at Washington Dc, USA.
11- Gheiby, A. H.,  Sen, P. N., Tillu, A. D., Puranik, D. M., and Karekar, R. N., Signatures of rain and thunderstorm and their location using AMSU-B data onboard NOAA-15, 16 satellites, Microwave Measurement and Techniques and Applications, Edited by J. Behari, 2003, Anamaya Publisher, New Dehli, India, pp. 134-146.
12- Goodrum, G., Kidwell K. B., and Winston W., 2007, NOAA K L M User’s Guide, Online at: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/pod-guide/ncdc/docs/klm/
13- Priddy, Kevin L., Keller, Paul E., Artificial Neural Networks: An Introduction, SPIE Book Store, pp. 180, 2005.
 
 
Nivar
Volume 37, 83-82 - Serial Number 83
September 2013
Pages 13-24

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 February 2016
  • Accept Date: 12 February 2016
  • First Publish Date: 12 February 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics